Häxan (1922)

Haxan.jpg

 “Centuries have passed and the Almighty of medieval times no longer sits in his tenth sphere. We no longer sit in church staring terrified at the frescoes of the devils. The witch no longer flies away on her broom over the rooftops. But isn’t superstition still rampant among us?”

I love both horror and documentaries, and they are both genres in which I could see myself creating a film myself. Häxan crosses both of these genres in one of the earliest documentaries, which confused and frustrated audiences upon its 1922 release. I think Häxan lays the groundwork for a lot of cool documentary/video essay techniques, and it reminds me of something like a History channel special today.

The movie is primarily concerned with how witches and other supernatural entities have been perceived in the past. There are a lot of neat images and works of art accompanied with well-researched narration to give the audience a sense of the terror that these forces elicited in the past, particularly in the Middle Ages which is the primary period of discussion for the movie. The film also gets into a lot of re-enactments with vibrant acting (and director Benjamin Christensen playing Satan himself) to present a few stories from the Medieval period about witches.

I elected to watch the Swedish Film Institute print of the movie. The shorter cut with William S. Burroughs narrating seems neat, but it’s probably not in the spirit of me “having seen” the movie. I’d like to see it eventually, along with the Criterion cut in a higher quality than the YouTube rip I watched. I think Häxan is about the visual experience more than its interspersed narratives, so the most high-definition version you can find would probably hold your attention even better. The title cards have some great content, but they do grow tedious and don’t really hold up as an artistic choice as with a film like Sunrise.

Häxan is really impressive as a piece of research, with Christensen citing various authorities on the subjects he discusses. There’s a clear fascination with the subject matter, and Christensen meticulously recreates scenarios with an impressive amount of detail. The movie was also very expensive, the most expensive Scandinavian film ever made at two million Swedish kronor. The entertainment value doesn’t hold up entirely, as could be predicted with a silent documentary from 1922, but there are always fun production details to look out for. It’s a movie where I spent a lot of time wondering how sets were constructed or why Christensen made certain decisions, so for an inquisitive film viewer, this isn’t a boring movie by any stretch.

This is a really fun work of both horror and history with a fascinating amount of force behind its production. I probably won’t return to Häxan any time soon, but it was a really neat watch nonetheless.


Films Left to Watch: 856

Advertisements

About Travis

I'm just some guy in college reviewing a bunch of movies. https://travisryanfilm.com/
This entry was posted in Reviews and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Häxan (1922)

  1. Pingback: Häxan (1922) — 1001 Film Reviews – horrorwriter

  2. This is a weird movie, isn’t it? I think the director got a bit carried away with all the awesome spectactles he could make and left the coherent story by the wayside. Still, with the moderne soundtrack it has a great goth vibe.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s